arithanas:

gaylileofigaro:

This is worse. Looking at these you can tell they have no significant monetary value. They were confiscated as a fear tactic. Nothing more.

This picture breaks my heart everytime it appears in my dash. It’s a fear tactic, alright but—

The first one in the left corner: It’s a first communion rosary, and it’s not cheap.

The black one in the first line: That’s a widow rosary and it’s old.

The white one in the second line:  is a commemoration rosary. It has a miniature picture in the round part. I haven’t seen that since the 70′s.

In the third line, multicolor one: It’s an Anima mundi, I have only seen those in the hands of Rosary ministery’s old ladies. The oldest ones are from the 80′s after Juan Pablo II came to Mexico for the first time. It’s one of the old ones, I know because the crucifixes are different. 

The third one on the fourth line: Red and gold. The style is old, the metal is dark, that’s a 50′s rosary, probably a quinceañera one (or it’s maybe older, from the 40′s when the brides carried red roses with their offerings).

The fifth one on the fourth line: It’s a quinceañera rosary with Ignatius’s tear. The style is old and in my part of Mexico is orphan girls who used it. At least it was when I was young.

The third one of the fifth line: the blue one with the anchor. That one I have only seen in Veracruz and it doesn’t look new.

The fifth one on the fifth line: That’s a 90′s wedding rosary. Black and white patterns were popular on that date.

The fourth one on the last line: That’s a first communion rosary from the 30′s. It’s delicate and most probably silver.

The rest wrench my heart too, the humble everyday rosaries with wooden beads and knots. Those are cheap and bear the wear and tear of their user handling. But those  I described are much more.

Those are mother’s rosaries.

Those are not just rosaries. Those are mementos, that’s the proof of their families stories. They are taking from them the only portable things they can carry to feel the connection to their families.

It’s not a fear tactic. Call it like by its name.

It’s dehumanization.

posted on June 25, 2018 with 91546 notes via captaincoffeegirl515 (orig camewiththeframe)
  1. bwxvsbxtmr reblogged this from mellenabrave
  2. candylover123rd reblogged this from killertoons
  3. 3yedwolf reblogged this from calibredgoddess
  4. emmba reblogged this from discovery21
  5. wellwhatttyaexpect reblogged this from anditslove
  6. acercrea reblogged this from muchymozzarella
  7. nevernotlikelove reblogged this from havekat
  8. agaveitalltobooze reblogged this from waxysoulweaving
  9. sweettooth5 reblogged this from absentlyabbie
  10. quimbry reblogged this from aestheticacoustic
  11. discovery21 reblogged this from wishful-thinkment
  12. hipersomniac reblogged this from marisaesfeminista
  13. vivalamusicaltheater reblogged this from anneonomus
  14. sexualrevoluti0n reblogged this from thepolyamorousqueer
  15. fsr10 reblogged this from hyliaschosenhero
  16. ihatecapitalism reblogged this from croen-fel-eira
  17. sickofthisbullshit reblogged this from camewiththeframe
  18. allhailtothekings reblogged this from redeggsandham
  19. kuromikoneko reblogged this from solemnly-mystifying
  20. marisaesfeminista reblogged this from glittering-snowfall
  21. rivercottagedweller reblogged this from thewitchofthenorse
  22. quiet-superstitions-in-my-head reblogged this from confessionofobsession
  23. maritzafloreslove reblogged this from studynest
  24. celtythegamer reblogged this from meap27
  25. heavymetalhexcode reblogged this from bunnythemurderer
  26. social-ragdoll reblogged this from lenle92
  27. kttag reblogged this from borishu
  28. camewiththeframe posted this
extasis